Help get the vote out!

My book is up for an award and it seems to take social media votes to win. Seems silly to ask people to vote – regardless if they read the book or not.?! Anyway, the publicity helps. See below – and Vote!.

Triple Nickel Press needs your help! From Idea to Exit has been nominated for a Small Business Book Award sponsored by Small Business Trends, and we need your votes! Winners are selected through voting which takes place from February 1 – February 16. It’s easy – to vote, simply click here

or paste this link in your browser

http://bookawards.smallbiztrends.com/story/27818

Click on the “VOTE” button. Come back daily and vote. (One vote per IP address, per book, per day)

If you’re on social media, please share the link and encourage others to vote daily!

Thank you for your support!!
Enjoy your journey,
Jeff Weber

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 11) – “Validation”

This may conclude my blog journal of the start up experience – at least for a while. For the past month or so I have been meeting with various stakeholders to validate our purpose, solution, business model and revenue streams. Everything has been positive, but since we are something new and leveraging very new concepts in gamification to direct desired user behavior, I have been looking to get some sort of overwhelming validation.

The break through came last night when one of my co-founders found this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnR5YYmyWqo&feature=email. Now this does not let the “cat out of the bag” on our solution but it profoundly validates that we are on target to something big. As such, I’ve decided to accelerate seeking funding. Ideally, I wanted to pick up some customers for our training and enterprise edition, however our first priority needs to be properly funded to complete our v.2 development roadmap as fast as possible.

Therefore, my goal is to pitch to the coasts and right here in Chicago to secure funding by the end of February. Honestly, I feel Job Search Board is the 1% that investors seek to make their portfolio profitable. Several converging factors explained in our executive summary are colliding making it urgent that we go to market now. Since I am currently a mentor, I plan to attend the Founder Institute summit Jan 19 in Mountain View, and with the help of my network and law firm Perkins Coie, I hope to secure some meetings while I’m out there.

This is going to be a very time consuming process and I’m not sure if I’ll have time to post. I’ll ask you to help us reach our goal by reaching out or passing our story along to those in the investment community who are looking for great promising companies. I think we “fit the bill”.

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 10) – “Break Throughs”

It has been a very busy time since my last entry.

1. We decided on a law firm.
We chose Perkins Coie to do our incorporation and founder’s agreement. They have a focus on start ups and have west coast roots. They have helped us to create a legal path with investors in mind and have experience and relationships in the VC world. Further they have a customer base that we may be able to be introduced to that could serve strategic partners or customers for our solution.

2. We decided on a new logo.
Our company was founded by “piggy backing” off of our founders existing consulting company. We somehow integrated a blend of logos and ended up with a confusing brand strategy – if you’d call it a strategy. So it was immediately evident that we needed to solidify our brand, logo, tag lines and general use of branding images. We used LogoDesignGuru to come up with a new logo. I was very happy with the experience and results. In five days we had over 100 design submissions and we will officially select our winner on Friday. I think it’s pretty cool.

3. We completed our “pitch” deck
Wow, what a process! This was probably two months or more in the making. Initial iterations of the deck were drastically changed based on where we are at today. Our business model and business concept has grown into sophistication and after seeing our latest screen designs I am really excited. We’ve really come up with a great and timely solution that potentially disrupts an industry – or at least attacks it from a completely new angle. We are able to say we are the only ones doing or providing certain aspects to solve some deep emerging problems in the employment vertical. I will share more when it is appropriate to do so. I do want to thank those at Mint.com and SCVNGR who shared some of their start up experience, which helped us formulate our solution.

The pitch deck is under 20 pages and has all of the major buckets investors should be looking for. The challenge is in conveying the depth of our solution in the allotted time. To do so, I need to practice, practice, practice the pitch. Not fun – but very anxious to get out and do it. We are ready to go full steam ahead as the market opportunity for our solution is now!

4. We determined the progression of our business model and revenue streams
So the pitch deck helps condense the business plan down to a very concise document. Part of the challenge in the deck was explaining our business model and how we make money. Since a big portion of our solution and secret sauce is dependent upon scaling users, some of our revenue streams will not activate until the user base grows to a certain level. However, we have other revenue streams which we can go after immediately. Therefore, our business model slide needed to show the various streams and when they would activate based on the launch, growth and maturity phase of our company. I got it down finally. A spreadsheet helps to run scenarios on projected revenue based on plugging in various selling prices and market acquisition percentages. Don’t ever tell investors your numbers are conservative! I will have to resist doing so myself. We have some really big potential, simply by hitting a few lead customer targets. Again, very exciting now that we have working models and plans that pull everything together.

5. We completed forecasts for sales and expenses and ideal amount to seek for funding
As I mentioned the sales forecast were completed once we identified our revenue streams and when they would activate. I also spent some time figuring out what resources were needed to make this all happen. That became our expense projections. Now that I had the revenue and the expense side, I could start to ascertain what amount of funding we need. This is tricky, as I am typically very conservative and would ask for as low amount of funds as possible. However, we have a unique business start up. I would say one of the few that has very large scalability and potential. I’ve reviewed and advised dozens of entrepreneurs and I have seen all sorts of businesses in all sorts of industries. Very few, had the high growth potential that investors struggle to discover. I can tell you, we have it. We have the social layer, the gamification layer (to direct behavior modification), training, unique process, mobility, large addressable market, API’s, community creation, CRM and more. All addressing unique market opportunities being driven by legislation, extreme environmental ramifications and technology advancements. A perfect storm. All of this necessitates that we get in the market now! To do so, we need funding. Further, our solution is involved and some may say complicated. We’re no iPad app – although that is on the roadmap We’re solving a big problem in a big way and we want to be the global leaders. So we are seeking $1.5mm in funding to make it happen.

6. We completed page designs for our v.2 of our site
I’ve put in the initial seed money to keep moving things forward; prior to $1.5mm we are seeking. This will sustain our development and other plans for some time, but we really can’t explode. We have two developers in India and we are seeking a US based user experience intern. One of the co-founders and me (there are three of us) architected the v.2 design and we’ve passed it to the graphic designer. The graphic designer will provide the screen designs and look and feel. We’ve gotten some of those pages back and all will be done by the end of December. Then the developer will rip into it. It’s really cool to see what the pages look like and once again, it is exciting.

So our solution has really come together over the past two weeks, but we still have a lot to do. Starting next week we go out selling our training and enterprise edition to get some customer and revenue traction. Further, we are working on two very strategic (big name) partnerships and hope to close those within a month. Our goal is to secure funding by the end of February.

That’s all for now!

(As always, forgive typos, etc. Just pounding out thoughts and moving on to the next to-do)

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 9) – “Hard Work Continues”

Monday roles around too fast (my target day to blog). Here we are at Tuesday.
We anticipate migrating from a partnership to a C corp, registered in Delaware by month’s end to take advantage of a unique investment exclusion for new start ups: (http://www.perkinscoie.com/news/pubs_detail.aspx?op=updates&publication=2896).
I thought I would bullet point my challenges and to do list today to provide a perspective on the varying pulls on an entrepreneur’s time during start up:

Legal
- Decide on law firm
- Meet with firm and establish operating agreement, stock rights, incorporation details, governance procedures, etc.
- Incorporate
- Pay all applicable fees for services and licenses
- Obtain contractor agreements and get our current offshore developers to sign off

Development
- Document all new development components and establish dates for completion.
- Decide on graphic design for page layout (User Experience).
- Add Feedback method to site pages for current users to provide input.
- Create rules and logic related to gamification aspect to site.
- Run through current reporting aspects.
- Create LinkedIn API.
- Formulate requirements for mobile and iPad application.

Staffing
- Determine requirements, write job description and source an intern for User Experience design.

Marketing & Sales
- Standardize everyone’s messaging (email signature, biz cards), etc.
- Decide on new Job Search Board Logo
- Complete white paper/endorsement from current customer
- Put correct logo placement on all works
- Close strategic opportunity to OEM our online training
- Move two other strategic opportunities forward and establish dates to close
- Set up the city of Toronto Social Services (Ontario Works Program) as a pilot for our online training
- Get report back on beta use at high profile college using our service for past month.
- Discuss & finalize revenue models & retail pricing with team
- Establish and act on go to market plan for our Enterprise Edition
- Secure new Canadian college beta site

Overall
- Establish yearly budget using seed capital and yearly budget using proposed investor funds.
This gives a sense of our top priorities. The true to do list is much longer. You have to break down what is most important to act on now and what you can do to bring revenue and users to the table as fast as possible. The focus is on getting things done. You can start 50 different things and not complete any of them. The role of the entrepreneur is to assemble the necessary resources to get a company launched. A big part of that then becomes delegation. So each of us has been assigned portions of the above “to-do” list, which we will accomplish or delegate out to other resources.

There is tremendous urgency to get further to market, yet we still need to balance the desired user experience. Therefore, we will have slow and planned releases to specific groups where we can closely monitor results. Once we are satisfied that we have the right mix of functionality and user experience we will kick into our go to market strategies designed to rapidly scale users.

But first things first, back to working on the business plan and investor deck.

Intern Wanted: User Experience Design

Opportunity:
Learn the pros and cons of a technology focused start up, planning for high growth and professional funding. Three seasoned professionals are the co-founders of this start up, which is based on many years of PhD level research. The company is led by a serial entrepreneur who founded TRC, Inc. in 1995, which made the INC 500 Fastest Private U.S. Companies list in 2001 and 2002 and was then sold to a Fortune 100 in 2006. Version 1.0 of the platform has been built and the next round of development is starting now, which will initiate the founders to seek their first round of funding. This company is funded currently off of founder’s seed capital and all three partners work virtually. Chicago area based.

What we are looking for:
Intern Responsibilities:
- Lead the charge on user experience for our solution
- Create wireframe and design interactions, task flows, screens and other details that optimize the user experience
- Prototype your designs and maybe even deliver HTML/CSS/JavaScript to our developers.
- Develop our own brand vocabulary when it becomes appropriate to do so.
- Creativity to establish a compelling product and user engagement.
- You are in charge of this critical area of development. We will lean on you and help find answers you can’t provide. True leadership and hands on experience.
Intern Requirements
- Ability to work remotely with minimal supervision.
- Sufficient knowledge to develop user experience for web applications.
- An entrepreneurial mindset. Someone who challenges us as much as we challenge them.
- Excellent visual and interaction design skills.
- Experience with social applications and current web functionality is highly desired.
- Ability to prototype designs is highly desired, however we will consider non-technical too.
- Regular communication via Skype, phone or face-to-face (ideally near you – no commute).

Who we are:
Job Search Board organizes the job search process and available resources resulting in improved productivity using a unique web-based process. That process empowers job seekers directly, the job professionals that assist them, and the hiring companies that employ them to continuously improve the job search process. This is a great opportunity to witness the start up process, while at the same time having tremendous autonomy in designing a world class user experience.

We’re not pretty, but we believe we have a team that can make it happen. Hopefully, we will be a company you will brag about and consider as an employer when appropriate.

Internship Learning Objectives:
- Work side by side with our team of seasoned professionals. JP Hatala is a PhD specialized in social capital, John Hillsman is a marketing expert who founded Sports @ Home and Jeff Weber is a serial entrepreneur who authored From Idea to Exit: The Entrepreneurial Journey¸was an advisor to dozens of start ups, angel investor, adjunct faculty teaching entrepreneurism and is highly connected to the Chicago start up scene.
- Intern will learn lean business start up principles, sales and marketing, customer intimacy, value proposition conveyed into a deliverable product and engagement of offshore development resources.
- Intern will likely witness and play a role in the funding process of a start up.
- Intern will participate and will provide input to tactical weekly meetings.
- Intern will be exposed to the founder’s professional network and company stakeholders.

Compensation: Hourly rate of $10 p/h and intern will be classified as a 1099 independent contractor and will be issued a Form 1099-MISC. Intern will be asked to sign a NDA as well as a contractor agreement related to works created by intern being owned and property of company.

We believe this will be a fun opportunity and a tremendous learning experience to any employer. Who knows we may be that employer down the road?

Contact: Jeff Weber,
President/CEO
Send all applications to: jweber@jobsearchboard.com

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 8) – “The Curtain Is Off”

I’ve decided it’s time to pull the curtain off this start up I’m involved with. I resisted at first, because I did not want people rushing to the site and forming opinions. Here’s why.

The company’s original focus was a tool to support job professionals counsel job seekers. You could say it is a CRM of sorts that allows job professionals to coach and monitor their clients. The tool in its current state is a train the trainer model. In other words, I need to train you how to use it, and then you go use it and bring on your clients. For those in the industry (job professionals) they “get it” pretty fast. However, for those just signing up on their own, they can get lost pretty fast. Further, the method to scale the tool to job professionals was not in place.

I also recognized and my co-founder team agreed, that there is a much bigger market in providing this tool directly to job seekers and allowing them to be self directed – in addition to using a job professional if they wished. So we’ve spent the last six weeks hashing out how to develop a self directed approach to the web tool. That in turn, required an entire review of the business model, revenue streams, go to market strategies, strategic alliance prospects and more. I’m happy to say we’ve got it figured out and are actively developing toward our 2.0 version.

To go down this path, I needed to validate that our target market wanted what we were going to offer. Sure I had a PhD behind the research and development of our product, but classroom sometimes does not meet “market”. So I went out to validate our business model with our two initial customer targets that are designed to pull in large numbers of users and serve as a single point of revenue for acquiring those users. I learned a great deal. I discovered new aspects of competition, potential overlap in some of our service offering, constrained funding and other aspects that may dampen our enthusiasm. However, I also discovered tremendous need and validation that we are on to something of tremendous value to a big market. A perfect storm is brewing and now timing is everything.

We are focused on the college career center and state employment agencies. In both cases, our company is looking to serve the unemployed. Colleges and state agencies represent a very large portion of the unemployed and that is why we selected them as our first primary “go to” markets. Significant events are happening in both.

1. Colleges
A piece of proposed federal legislation called the Gainful Employment Rule. The wiki says, “create career colleges and training programs that better prepare students for gainful employment. In order to determine if programs prepare students for gainful employment, the U.S. Department of Education intends to measure the relationship between the debt students incur and their incomes after completing the program as well as the rate in which program enrollees repay their loans. If a program, graduates a large share of students with high debt-to-income ratios, the program may be ineligible to participate in federal student funding.”
This Rule is impacting for-profit colleges dramatically right now and it is highly influencing every other type of traditional college who fears they may be next.

2. Employment Agencies.
Again legislation has come into play where unemployment benefits have been extended from 26 weeks to 99 weeks. Take into account the number of people now off the unemployment books and who designate themselves as underemployed, you have a very large market of job seekers. Something has to give as it relates to benefits being extended to 99 weeks. States are increasingly looking for solutions to get people back to work and to be placed in the right jobs for them and the employer.

We believe we have a solution that serves both of these target market and the job seekers they support. By going out and listening to our customers we’ve learned a bunch, which has influenced our feature set and development roadmap. We’ve allowed a customer in Canada to use our product in its 1.0 version and they love it! They claim use of our system gets people to work faster than the comparable 18 other similar agencies that do not use our product. Wow – what an endorsement – and that’s just using version 1.0!

So at this point I am comfortable to share the company name and more details. Mind you, we still have to incorporate – plan to do that this week. We are operating under a partnership agreement at the moment. Once we incorporate as a C registered in Delaware we will aggressively go for funding. Why funding? Because we have an opportunity that is perishable. While the competition is focused from the angle of the employer, passive candidates and recruiters (i.e. LinkedIn and others) we are focused on providing the unemployed job seeker with aggregated resources, training and a process that gets them zeroed in on their ideal job and employed faster.

A big part of our solution is helping seekers build their social capital. That involves networking which “Gives & Takes”. As a company we need to practice what we preach and thus the reason for my blogging. Further, I’m open to help any entrepreneurs at any stage of their business with my feedback and experience to help in their efforts. Just send me an email.

Finally, without further adieu our company name is Job Search Board and can be found at www.jobsearchboard.com. It is open for business for job coaches, job recruiters and counselors. We expect the v.2.0 to be on line in about four weeks where individuals can self direct their search using our process.

We spent a great deal of time on legal counsel review, name review, target market, problem identification and validation. Next topics will cover code development, IP protection, operational process development for sales and marketing and probably a hundred other things.

Disclaimer: As always, I apologize for poor grammar. I’m writing fast to get back to page design and wire frames.

Enjoy your journey!
www.jeffweberventures.com

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 7) – “Preparing for Startup”

Big post today! There is much to bring you up to date with and I’ll do so as fast as possible. We are working at a feverish pace and that’s delayed my postings. Here we go.

You’ve met the co-founders, how the idea was formed and how I came on board. So the two original cofounders took their idea and started developing. In short order, they developed a functional site and a Facebook API. Pretty impressive honestly. I was attracted to these early “raw” elements and that led to my involvement. However, once I jumped in full time I started to uncover gaps in the start up. Every start up has its gaps; the key is knowing what they are and having a plan to fix them. Let’s go over what I found and compare it to your start up.

Corporate Structure
- Set up quickly as a partnership between the two co-founders and I was added down-stream. Low to no cost to set up and obtain a FEIN tax id. Very brief document that basically says, “We’re partners and this is our percentage ownership in the company”.
- No shareholder or operating agreement established at this point. There is no detailed document explaining the agreement made between co-founders, other than the percentage of ownership.

Development
- A developer in India is hired to build the site. No contractual agreement is made with this person to be hired as a contractor. No NDA, no agreement as to ownership of the intellectual property created.
- The developer does not document anything created. The co-founder simply describes what he wants and the developer codes. No wire frames, mapping or other documentation is created.

Basics
- No business plan written.
- No accountant or legal firm involved at this point.
- No bank account established.
- One partner (the major shareholder) is a Canadian citizen and ramifications are not researched.

Co-Mingle of Funds
- All of the expense being made to date are done out of pocket. Not recorded in central location.

Many of you may say, “big deal, why are these items above gaps”? We’re doing the same thing. Well, they are more than gaps, they are problems! But problems many start ups encounter in their early days. Remember, the co-founders both work day jobs and went from idea to a functional product in six months and launched a beta site with 1400 users. Now it is time to clean things up to be prepared for growth, become a real company and seek funding. Let’s look at the gaps again, see why they are a gap and how I corrected them or at least plan to correct them.

Corporate Structure
- Set up as a partnership.
A partnership is not terrible, but it fails to insulate the founders from liability. Now that we are ready to go to market we need to legally separate ourselves from the business entity (choice is to a LLC, S or C corporation). We know our highly scalable, fast growth potential company will require funding to help us take advantage of the market opportunity. That said, investors will likely require us to be a C corporation. Any entity type with pass through income reporting (i.e. LLC, S) are cumbersome and restrictive to the professional investor. Further, having a foreign citizen as an owner excludes us from being a S corporation.

The process of incorporating as a C will address the informalities the partnership presented. Using a well researched law firm, we will take into consideration vesting, share price, number of authorized and issued shares, shareholder rights and how this all sets up for a professional investor’s expectations and requirements. My first company was an S corp, second was a LLC and now this will be a C. Each had unique requirements and reasoning for the corporate structure selected and that was dependent upon the planned journey I expected to take with each. Each time, professional advisors helped me select the right structure up front, helping me to avoid headache and expense downstream.

Development
Yieks, this is probably the biggest concern I jumped on first. Our entire company is dependent upon the IP we create. It is how we address the problem our target customer has. It is the secret sauce that investors will clamor over and position them for a successful exit. Here are the steps I have taken to protect our ID, establish a solid operational procedure, and pass the due diligence mustard when applicable.

- All developers hired as contractors are required to sign a NDA.
- All developers hired as contractors are required to sign a work for hire agreement to establish corporate authorship that all works are owned by our company. Basically, we own the code.
- Conduct all steps to demonstrate and maintain that contractors are just that contractors and not employees of the company. We do this several ways including; through the agreement created, requiring them to submit invoices to our company, not allowing them to use our email address, requesting them to establish themselves as some sort of company by which we contract with versus an individual.
- We will start to request the developer to properly document anything they create. If the developer can not comply, we will have to find a new developer.

Basics
- No business plan written.
Now many will say, “The hell with business plans, just start”. I however, need and require a business plan. We are going somewhere unknown. We need a plan to get there and we need direction. It’s like taking the time to put an address into a GPS so it can lead you to the destination. Now that we have a destination, it is time to write a business plan. It starts being created for our team internally to understand how to execute. It is then transformed into an investor deck/presentation.

- No accountant or legal firm involved at this point.
I went back to my previous accountant that I worked with for ten years. The important aspect is ensuring that our accountant has worked with and understands C corporations and firms that have solicited and received outside investor funding. The law firm had to have the same qualifications and even more emphasis placed on their understanding of IP and the high growth start up.

- No bank account established.
Once we incorporate, we can open a bank account properly. That alleviates the issue of co-mingled funds and allows shareholders to purchase stock, where proceeds are deposited. Further, it allows us to start doing business with customers. The customers we target would be hesitant to work with a Partnership and certainly one without formal banking procedures in order. We will compliment this with a monthly license for QuickBooks to record our transactions properly.

I apologize for any shortness in grammar, but I had a lot to update you on. Next week we’ll talk about development and product features and validation. Also, we are starting to go to market to generate some revenue – wish us luck. As a mentor for Future Founders, I am sharing my experience in greater detail with 12 Chicago entrepreneurs who are getting ready to create and launch their companies right now. If you want more details or have questions, give me a shout. I hope you find this helpful.

Now, back to wire frames!

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 6) – “The three of us”

To date, you’ve heard a bit from the two original co-founders. How they met and how the idea formed. Well now we’ll tell you how I came on board.
I was advising companies one day a week (which, actually turned into five days a week) for a grant funded program I launched called “High Growth Illinois”. One day John, co-founder #2) came in to share his pitch and desire to seek funding. He went through his slide deck and I was intrigued. His plan was in a big market that was recession proof – in fact flourishes in bad times – as well as good. His approach was novel and incorporated proprietary processes. On top of all that, his system captured data that has been lacking visibility in this market. What John presented was a web based platform to help job seekers find their ideal job, which he called Job A. Which meant at times, the job seeker would have to take a Job B in order to develop skills and experience for them to get to their Job A. This platform provided something that was missing from a job seeker’s perspective and that was a research proven best practices “process” to find a job. The platform integrated the seeker’s social graph and added a layer of gameification. I was hooked.

The original co-founder, JP, is an Assistant Professor at Rochester Institute of Technology, Senior Fellow at University of Ottawa and Adjunct Professor at Louisiana State University focused on Human Resource Education, Workforce Development and social capital in the workplace. Therefore, I was really confident that the processes and unique IP poured into this plan had merit. So we quickly went from advisory to investing. I wanted in on this opportunity and discussed angel investing. John and JP were intent and preparing to seek 1.5 million, but some early seed money was needed. They had already contributed their own funds to build out the first iteration of the web site and create a Facebook application using a developer in India. However, there was still work to be done.

The discussion of funding quickly moved to talent and roles. Both John and JP felt they were not best suited to be president and asked me to fill that role. John knew me from the industry we both shared in the past and he followed the success of my first company, which I sold to a Fortune 100 in 2006. I gladly accepted the role, as I had been wanting to get back in the startup world. This seemed to be an opportunity that met my qualifications of a high growth, rapidly scalable business in a very large and global market. It was technology focused and had unique IP that addressed a problem in a targeted market.

So I accepted the position in October and we have been refining things ever since as rapidly as possible. Next week I’ll share more of the details of reviewing the business plan, finding gaps and getting focus. As a start up, nothing stays the same and for better or for worse, I’ve looked at numerous changes, tweaks and areas of clean up. We’ve done a pivot of sorts and need to move from a hastily formed partnership into a corporation. I am challenging the name of the company as well as the desired functionality surrounding our core offering. Thankfully, all three of us have an open mind and can freely exchange ideas and suggestions. We need to nail down many items rapidly so we can focus on 2.0 of development and our future road map. This will allow each of us to settle into more defined roles and focus on our go to market strategy. Again, more of those details to come next week. Now things are getting interesting!

From Idea to Exit Winner of the USA Book News “Best Books 2011”

Winner of the USA Book News “Best Books 2011” Award in the category of Business: Entrepreneurship and Small Business.

http://www.usabooknews.com/bestbooks2012awards/bestbooks2011results.html

The Birth of a Start Up – Built In Chicago! (Part 5) – “Founders Meet”

The last entry I placed was from the primary founder of our start up – the guy with the idea. He’s a PhD living in Canada and he is referenced in this post provided by the second co-founder. He shares how the two met and decided to pursue the idea. Here we go…

I actually met my partner in this business over six years ago while I was the head of Merchandising and Marketing for a major national academic technology reseller. He had a non-technical pen and paper course and a board game that he had developed for instructing students/learners in how to become a more strategic networker, showing them how to set goals and objectives, determine who in their network might have the resources or knowledge (social capital), and then determine the right strategy for approaching those people for their assistance to achieve one’s goals and objectives. The process is called social capital development and was being taught in this pen and paper fashion in some Louisiana high schools with very good success, particularly in how it related to using networking for your job search and new employment. I was very intrigued by his notion and convinced that social capital development (or “purposeful social networking”) was not only a skill that could be taught, but with the growing idea of social media (at that time) and continued growth of virtual workers, it could potentially become a skill set that every student/employee could and should be taught (very similar to the way keyboarding and other computer technology skills had emerged as a key skills taught in the personal computing era). The problem was I could not convince the company I was at that time to invest in moving it from pen and paper to a more technology friendly form.

After leaving that company in mid-2010, I began working in the mobile and social learning space and together with my new employer developed the social capital development and another (21st century job search management) into online, self- directed courses. As part of the development of the courses (particularly the job search management) I learned of an online tool he was building in the areas of job search and career management and saw the early versions of what he was building to address a very strong need in our growing troubled economy – a job search/career management process for individual job seekers that covered the entire job search and long term career process – not just finding recent opportunities and applying to them. He and I formed a partnership to continue the development of this online platform and have worked together (he on the product, me on the business side) to move the project forward. We recently added a seasoned entrepreneurial executive (Jeff Weber) to join us as our President shortly after he invested in the venture. We are now finalizing our product, business plan and initial go target markets strategy….stay tuned for more to come!

Side Note from Jeff: The original concept of the online tool was focused on job coaches to use as a way to manage multiple job seeker clients. We call it the enterprise edition and that product is completely built out. But the founders realized that a larger opportunity existed if we turned over that enterprise functionality to the individual job seeker if they wanted a self directed approach. Therefore, we are now developing that functionality and user experience. We have identified two target markets to approach with solid value propositions. We are testing the validity of our revenue models to those markets by assembling a board of advisors (made up of our target customer). I had intended to be more detailed in each step of the way, but there is much going on and little time to blog. The next entry I will share how all three partners are now working together and how that dynamic has led to pivots in the business plan as we refine the right way to go to market. It has been a lot of work, but I think we are ready for prime time as beta users come on line!